A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Exclusive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological outcomes, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Periods documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main of your dispute can be a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments hooked up towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is enthusiastic by issue for environmental protection and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their extended-standing relationship to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple basically endeavoring to create a relatives house in accordance While using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Skilled advice and permitted programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering the sea throughout a storm, do not change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above design of wall at coastal web site has become a shorthand description for your circumstance that many observers see as significantly frequent. As sea stages increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to area advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinctive professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous With Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 all the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through waistline-higher h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting both equally the physical fact on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket must determine whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.